Youtube

Archive for Articles

The photograph at right shows the ruins of the Agora at Izmir, a Turkish city on the Mediterranean coast of Asia Minor. “Wait a minute,” you say; “isn’t the Agora a feature of Greek cities?”

Indeed it is; the agora is the marketplace of a Greek polis. The word αγορά is from αγείρειν, meaning “to gather” or “to collect”, and is related to the words “aggregate” and “gregarious”. It’s the gathering place at the heart of a Greek city.

And the city of Izmir hasn’t always been called that. Before it became a Turkish city, it had been Smyrna, a major Greek port and trading center for more than two millennia. Even after becoming part of the Ottoman Empire it remained a primarily Christian city, home to many thousands of Greeks and Armenians.

The burning of SmyrnaUntil 1922, that is. The week of September 11-17, to be precise. During that period the city was occupied by the forces of Mustafa Kemal, a.k.a. Kemal Attaturk. The Christian areas of the city were looted and torched, and the Armenians and the Greeks were driven from their homes to flee the city or be slaughtered. Of the 400,000 Christians resident in the city beforehand, virtually none remained, and more than 190,000 were never accounted for. The Archbishop Chrysostomos was among the victims, murdered at the hands of a mob while under the “protection” of French marines. The city, except for the Turkish quarter, was reduced to a smoking ruin.

So here we are at yet another anniversary. Another 9-11, and also a 9-17.

*   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *
Let’s back off a little bit and look at the history of Asia Minor. Below is a map of the region in ancient times, as it was more or less in the time of St. Paul.

Asia Minor in the 1st century A.D.
Notice all the place names on the map. Those cities and regions were Greek, and had been for a thousand years. While St. Paul was making his way through Asia Minor to Corinth, the Turks were still a tribe of Mongol nomads in the Central Asian uplands.

After the rise of Islam the Turks migrated to Anatolia, picked up Islam on the way, and succeeded where the Arabs had failed, conquering the Byzantine Empire piece by piece. The city of Smyrna fell first to the Seljuk Turks in 1084, was regained by the Greeks, and then later was conquered by the Ottoman Turks. It remained in Ottoman hands until modern times, but was still primarily a Greek and Armenian city, home to thousands of Christian dhimmis.

At the beginning of the 20th century there were an estimated 4.5 million Christians in what is now Turkey, most of them Greek. In 1979 the Greek Orthodox population in Turkey was thought to be no more than 7,000, and is now down to about 2,000.

Where did all those Greeks go? Demetrios didn’t just turn to Sofia one day and say, “Darling, let’s load all our worldly goods onto the donkey cart and we’ll move to Athens or Thessalonica.” It’s not like Smyrna was proselytized by gentle imams who were so persuasive that the entire Greek population converted to Islam, gave up their Greek surnames, and took on Turkish ones instead.

No, Asia Minor was cleared of Greeks and Armenians in the traditional manner, by blood and fire, by the sword and the bullet, by rapine and looting and unimaginable slaughter. But this didn’t happen in 670, or 1084, or 1453, or 1683. It was in 1922, in the recently departed 20th century. It was the Rwanda and Darfur of the 1920s, and it occurred within living memory. Or it would be living, if the memory of it hadn’t been dumped down the oubliette along with all the other inconvenient facts that the bien-pensants would rather not think about.

*   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *
When the “Sick Man of Europe” — the Ottoman Empire — finally expired at the end of the Great War, the formerly Ottoman lands were divided up by the Western Allies according to the national aspirations of the inhabitants as well as the mercantile schemes of the British and the French. Greece had won her independence from the Ottomans in 1821, but much of Asia Minor, though ethnically Greek, remained part of the Ottoman Empire until it was allotted to the Greek nation under the Treaty of Sèvres in 1920.

The defeat at the hands of the Allies helped spark Kemal Attaturk’s “Young Turk” revolution that overthrew the Ottomans and replaced them with a secular Turkish nationalist government. In 1921 Greek forces secured Smyrna and moved inland to engage the Turkish nationalist army. Unfortunately, they were no match for their opponents, and were pushed back across the Bosphorus by the Turks. Any Greek civilians who failed to flee with them were left to face the revenge of Kemal’s army.

The awful dénouement was realized most vividly in Smyrna. According to Western eyewitness accounts ( derided as “tall tales” by some Turks, but confirmed by other Turkish sources), Turkish soldiers methodically put the Greek and Armenian quarters to the torch when the winds were blowing away from the Turkish quarter. Christian homes and businesses were looted, Christian women were raped by soldiers while their families were slaughtered, and what remained of the Christian populace gathered on the quayside between the flaming city and the waters of the harbor.

Like the people trapped on the upper floors of the World Trade Center, the Christians of Smyrna faced the choice of dying in the inferno or jumping. Many of them did jump, and those who could swim tried to reach the Allied warships anchored in the harbor.

But the British and French seamen had orders from headquarters not to allow any refugees aboard. They cut the ropes and threw water onto the desperate Greeks trying to climb aboard, and many thousands of people drowned.

*   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *
Not our finest hour, eh?

The Western Allies had read the writing on the wall, and could see that Kemal Attaturk and his genocidal soldiers were the wave of the future. Commercial interests were at stake, after all, so Attaturk got the assistance of the West, the Greeks were driven from Asia Minor, and the Treaty of Sèvres was discarded. The facts on the ground were codified by a new treaty, the Treaty of Lausanne, in 1923.

Massacre victims at SmyrnaThe Greek Holocaust was a secular one, perpetrated by Turkish nationalists out to secularize the country, and not a product of jihad. Even so, the corpses strewn in the streets were all Christians, and were derided by their murderers as gâvur, the Turkish version of the Arabic word kaffir, or infidels.

And so we have another series of grainy monochrome photos of corpses, the familiar spawn of the 20th century. The brutalized and desecrated victims lie in disordered heaps while the onlookers and perpetrators stare nonchalantly into the camera. The Balkans, Russia, and now Turkey; later Spain, Germany, Czechoslovakia, Poland, the Ukraine, Bosnia, and Kosovo, on and on and on…

Asia Minor becomes Griechenrein. Turkey becomes a modern, secular, “European” state. The Turks flood Europe.

And so we move on into the 21st century.

READ MORE HERE

The Other 911

Last year on September 11th I composed a memorial post, and then went browsing among all the other bloggers who had posted their own memorials. There were some excellent posts and photo essays, notably at Michelle Malkin, Dr. Sanity, and CUANAS, and all so much better than my own.

So this year I will do something different: I will commemorate the events of five years ago by revisiting events of 323 years ago. I refer, of course, to the other 9-11: September 11th, 1683, the day when an alliance of Christian armies led by Jan III Sobieski, the King of Poland, arrived at the Gates of Vienna.

Jan III Sobieski confronts Pasha Kara Mustafa at the Gates of Vienna
The Ottoman Empire had been expanding into Europe ever since Constantinople fell to the Turks, and even before that. Wherever the Muslim armies went, they plundered cities, took slaves, turned churches into mosques, and converted many thousands of Christian captives to Islam at the point of a sword.

The Sultan’s armies overran Greece, Bulgaria, Romania, and Serbia. They turned Protestant Hungary into a compliant vassal and made war repeatedly on Austria and the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth. The Ottomans had designs on Vienna, since the fall of the city would open the way into the heart of Austria and the rich principalities of southern Germany.

The Turks besiege ViennaHaving failed to take Vienna in the siege of 1529, the Turks prepared a second attempt in 1683. Under the leadership of the Grand Vizier, Pasha Kara Mustafa, and with their Tatar and Malaysian allies, they made their preparations and fought their way towards the capital, overrunning Austrian villages and smaller cities in their path and taking many captives. As the Muslim hordes approached Vienna, King Leopold fled west with most of the citizens, leaving a garrison of about 11,000 soldiers and 5,000 citizen volunteers to hold the city against the Turks. The Viennese razed buildings in the area around the city walls in order to deny the enemy cover, and brought livestock and provender into the city to prepare for a siege.

On July 16th, 1683, the second siege of Vienna began. The tiny garrison in the city was no match for Kara Mustafa’s army of 140,000, but the Grand Vizier decided to starve the city into submission rather than attempt a frontal assault on its defenses.

*   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *
One of the main reasons the Turks had had such success in the Balkans and Eastern Europe was that their Christian enemies were unable to unite against them. Since the Caliphate and the Ottoman Empire were one and the same thing, Islam experienced no such fractiousness, and it was a united horde that advanced inexorably through the mountain passes and across the plains towards Vienna.

READ MORE HERE

Some people refer to the current war as the GWoT (Global War on Terror). Others call it WWIV (Norman Podhoretz). We at Gates of Vienna prefer to call it GIJ3W: The Great Islamic Jihad, Third Wave.
This conflict of cultures has endured for more than a millenium. The first wave began with the conquest of Mecca by Mohammed in 630 CE. It crested in Al Andalus (Moorish Spain) in 711, only receding in 1492 when Los Reyes Católicos entered Granada.

The second wave began when Osman raided Western Byzantium in 1299 and founded the Ottoman Empire. It crested during the reign of Süleyman I in the 16th century, and receded after the failure of the second siege of Vienna under Kara Mustafa in 1683.

From our perspective at the dawn of the 21st century it is hard to realize that a little more than three centuries ago the whole of Christian civilization was threatened. When the Turks stood at the Gates of Vienna it seemed that all of Europe would be overrun by the legions of the Prophet.

This war never ended. While many individual treaties were made between various states over the centuries, no truce was ever declared between Islam and the infidels, and no permanent peace was established (as General Gordon discovered at Khartoum in 1885).

So when did the Third Wave begin?

When will the Third Wave crest? And when will it begin to recede?

http://gatesofvienna.blogspot.com/2004/10/newest-phase-of-very-old-war.html

  1. Yawning is from Satan (Volume 4, Book 54, Number 509) – The Prophet said, “Yawning is from Satan and if anyone of you yawns, he should check his yawning as much as possible, for if anyone of you (during the act of yawning) should say: ‘Ha’, Satan will laugh at him.”
  2. Yawning is from Satan and Allah likes sneezing and dislikes yawning (Volume 8, Book 73, Number 245) – The Prophet said, “Allah likes sneezing and dislikes yawning, so if someone sneezes and then praises Allah, then it is obligatory on every Muslim who heard him, to say: May Allah be merciful to you (Yar-hamuka-l-lah).  but as regards yawning, it is from Satan, so one must try one’s best to stop it, if one says ‘Ha’ when yawning, Satan will laugh at him.”
  3. Satan stayed in the upper part of a nose all night (Volume 4, Book 54, Number 516) – The Prophet said, “If anyone of you rouses from sleep and performs the ablution, he should wash his nose by putting water in it and then blowing it out thrice, because Satan has stayed in the upper part of his nose all the night.”
  4. A cock crows because it has seen an angel and donkeys bray because they have seen Satan (Volume 4, Book 54, Number 522) – The Prophet said, “When you hear the crowing of cocks, ask for Allah’s Blessings for (their crowing indicates that) they have seen an angel, And when you hear the braying of donkeys, seek refuge with Allah from Satan for (their braying indicates) that they have seen a Satan.”
  5. Satan touches all human offspring making them cry (Volume 4, Book 55, Number 641) – Abu Huraira said, “I heard Allah’s Apostle saying, ‘There is none born among the off-spring of Adam, but Satan touches it.  A child therefore, cries loudly at the time of birth because of the touch of Satan, except Mary and her child.”  Then Abu Huraira recited: “And I seek refuge with You for her and for her offspring from the outcast Satan”
  6. When praying while standing, Satan puts doubts into the person (Volume 2, Book 22, Number 324) - Allah’s Apostle said, “When anyone of you stands for the prayers, Satan comes and puts him in doubts till he forgets how many Rakat he has prayed.  So if this happens to anyone of you, he should perform two prostrations of Sahu while sitting.”
  7. During sleep Satan ties knots at the back of the head (Volume 4, Book 54, Number 491) – Allah’s Apostle said, “During your sleep, Satan knots three knots at the back of the head of each of you, and he breathes the following words at each knot, ‘The night is long, so keep on sleeping,’ If that person wakes up and celebrates the praises of Allah, then one knot is undone, and when he performs ablution the second knot is undone, and when he prays, all the knots are undone, and he gets up in the morning lively and gay, otherwise he gets up dull and gloomy.”
  8. Satan peed in the ear of a man (Volume 4, Book 54, Number 492) – It was mentioned before the Prophet that there was a man who slept the night till morning (after sunrise).  The Prophet said, “He is a man in whose ears Satan had urinated.”
  9. Earthquakes and afflictions come out of the side of the head of Satan (Volume 2, Book 17, Number 147) – The Prophet said, “O Allah!  Bless our Sham and your Yemen.”  People said, “Our Najd as well.”  The Prophet again said, “O Allah!  Bless our Sham and Yemen.”  They said again, “Our Najd as well.”  On that the Prophet said, “There will appear earthquakes and afflictions, and from there will come out the side of the head of Satan.”
  10. Muhammad choked Satan for interrupting prayer (Volume 2, Book 22, Number 301) – The Prophet once offered the prayer and said, “Satan came in front of me and tried to interrupt my prayer, but Allah gave me an upper hand on him and I choked him, No doubt, I thought of tying him to one of the pillars of the mosque till you get up in the morning and see him.  Then I remembered the statement of Prophet Solomon, ‘My Lord!  Bestow on me a kingdom such as shall not belong to any other after me.’  Then Allah made him (Satan) return with his head down humiliated.”
  11. Satan passes wind and runs so he may not hear the Adhan (call to prayer) (Volume 2, Book 22, Number 313) – Allah’s Apostle said, “When the Adhan for the prayer is pronounced, then Satan takes to his heels passing wind so that he may not hear the Adhan and when the Muadh-dhin finishes, he comes back;

http://contenderministries.org/islam/onsatan.php

FOX NEWS – America is “under attack” by a non-violent “stealth jihad,” a panel of national security analysts warned in a new report that claimed fundamentalists are trying to bring Islamic law known as “Shariah” to the United States.

The report, sponsored by the Center for Security Policy and touted by a handful of conservative lawmakers on Capitol Hill Wednesday, said that the violent threat posed by Al Qaeda and other terror groups is outmatched by the threat from jihadists allegedly trying to change American society from within.

“This form of warfare includes multi-layered cultural subversion, the co-opting of senior leaders, influence operations and propaganda and other means of insinuating Shariah into Western societies,” the study said.

The report cited the Muslim Brotherhood as the most influential organization trying to achieve that goal, but expressed concern more about America’s vulnerability than any marquee successes by the so-called “stealth” jihadists.

“Just as we cannot say all Muslims hold a certain view based on the actions of a radical fringe … it would be unwise to discount the malicious intentions of those that wish to subvert American law,” Rep. Trent Franks, R-Ariz., said at a press conference Wednesday.

The study urged government to be more vigilant by threatening Shariah-promoting imams with investigation and monitoring the contents of school textbooks.

The report cited as warning signs the deadly Fort Hood shooting as well as a recent case where a New Jersey judge rejected a woman’s request for a restraining order against her husband whom she claimed sexually abused her. In the New Jersey case, the judge ruled that the husband acted according to his Muslim beliefs; the decision was overturned in July by New Jersey’s Appellate Court.

“Still, the fact that such a reversal was necessary is instructive,” the Shariah report said.

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2010/09/15/america-threatened-stealth-jihad-security-report-warns/

The Crusades are much in the news of late. President Bush made the mistake of referring to the war against terrorism as a “crusade” and was roundly criticized for uttering a word both offensive and hurtful to the world’s Muslims. If it is painful, then it is remarkable indeed how often the Arabs themselves make use of the word. Osama bin Laden and Mullah Omar have repeatedly referred to Americans as “crusaders” and the present war as a “crusade against Islam.” For decades now Americans have been routinely referred to as “crusaders” or “cowboys” among Arabs in the Middle East. Clearly the crusades are very much alive in the Muslim world.

They are not forgotten in the West either. Actually, despite the many differences between the East and West, most people in both cultures are in agreement about the Crusades. It is commonly accepted that the Crusades are a black mark on the history of Western civilization generally and the Catholic Church in particular. Anyone eager to bash Catholics will not long tarry before brandishing the Crusades and the Inquisition. The Crusades are often used as a classic example of the evil that organized religion can do. Your average man on the street in both New York and Cairo would agree that the Crusades were an insidious, cynical, and unprovoked attack by religious zealots against a peaceful, prosperous, and sophisticated Muslim world.

It was not always so. During the Middle Ages you could not find a Christian in Europe who did not believe that the Crusades were an act of highest good. Even the Muslims respected the ideals of the Crusades and the piety of the men who fought them. But that all changed with the Protestant Reformation. For Martin Luther, who had already jettisoned the Christian doctrines of papal authority and indulgences, the Crusades were nothing more than a ploy by a power-hungry papacy. Indeed, he argued that to fight the Muslims was to fight Christ himself, for it was he who had sent the Turks to punish Christendom for its faithlessness. When Sultan Suleiman the Magnificent and his armies began to invade Austria, Luther changed his mind about the need to fight, but he stuck to his condemnation of the Crusades. During the next two centuries people tended to view the Crusades through a confessional lens: Protestants demonized them, Catholics extolled them. As for Suleiman and his successors, they were just glad to be rid of them.

Read More→

SUBSCRIBE TO THIS BLOGS POSTINGS

FROM Islam Watch- To explain the Arabic word TAQIYAH, Hughes Dictionary of Islam says, “Literally it means “Guarding oneself”. (It’s a) Shi’ah doctrine. A pious fraud whereby a Shi’ah Muslim believes he is justified in either smoothing down or in denying the peculiarities of his religious belief, in order to save himself from religious persecutions. A Shi’ah can, therefore, pass himself off as a Sunni to escape persecution.”


“The Shi’ah traditionalists relate that certain persons inquired of the Imam Sadiq if the Prophet had ever practiced taqiyyah or “religious dissimulations”, and the  Imam replied:”Not after this verse was sent down to the Prophet, namely Surah v71: ‘O thou Apostle! Publish the whole of what has been revealed to those from thy Lord; if thou do it not, thou, thou hast not preached His message, and God will not defend thee from the wicked men; for God guides not the unbelieving people. When the Most High became surety for the Prophet against harm, then he no longerdissimulated, although before this revelation appeared he had occasionally done so.”[1]

Commenting on the Islamic practice of taqiyyah, noted scholar Babu Susilan writes: “Under the Islamic concept of Al-Takkeya, it is legitimate for Muslims to lie, cheat, murder, deceive and violate non-Muslims. According to Takkeya, Muslims are sanctioned to communicate with fake sincerity. In reality, they may have just the opposite agenda in their hearts. It is clear that Islam permits the Muslims to lie anytime, anywhere to promote the cause of Islam.”

To narrate how a law-abiding non-Muslim society is harmed by this dirty concept of Islamic taqiyyay, he writes, “The concept of Al-Takeyya (lying) for the cause of Islam bears gross implications for freedom loving, law abiding non-Muslims. Muslims can negate any agreement, cheat, deceive, lie, and absolve from any permanent commitment. When a Muslim says “Islam is peace”, watch out. When a Muslim shout “Allah loves you”, he mean “Allah hates you” unless you are a Muslim.”

He adds: “There are many incidences in the life of Mohammed where he often lied and instructed his followers to do the same. A good example is the assassination of Kaab Ibn Ashrf, a member of the Jewish tribe, Banu al-Nudair. Mohammed ordered his assassination by deception, lying and tricks. Mohammed also ordered the murder of Shaalan by deception and lying. Islamic history is replete with incidents of murder and assassination by deception”.[2]

In his article, The principle of Al-Takeyya, the author says, “The Arabic word, “Takeyya”, means “to prevent,” or guard against. The principle of Al Takeyya conveys the understanding that Muslims are permitted to lie as a preventive measure against anticipated harm to one’s self or fellow Muslims. This principle gives Muslims the liberty to lie under circumstances that they perceive as life threatening. Islamic scholars believe that Muslims can even deny the faith publicly, declaring them non-Muslims, for saving their lives, if they do not mean it in their hearts, following the Quranic verse (3:28):

“Let not the believers Take for friends or helpers Unbelievers rather than believers: if any do that, in nothing will there be help from Allah: except by way of precaution (prevention), that ye may Guard yourselves from them (prevent them from harming you.). But Allah cautions you (To remember) Himself; for the final goal is to Allah.”

So, in simple words, taqiyyah is an example of Islamic style of deception, originated in the Koran, which Muslims profusely use to deceive and fool the non-Muslims. This manifests to what degree, Islam permits a Muslim to indulge in lying and cheating the infidels.

Two Faces of Koran

Read More→

SUBSCRIBE TO THIS BLOGS POSTINGS

FROM ISLAM WATCH – In the early 1930’s the ‘free world’ made the mistake of dismissing Hitler’s words as mere threats and ravings. Will the West make the same mistake when continually confronted with Islamic terror?

Since the atrocities committed on 9/11/01 by Middle Eastern Muslim terrorists in the name of Islam, people in the U.S. and West have debated whether Islam is “a religion of peace” or more of an all-encompassing totalitarian ideology cloaked in religious garb. Unfortunately, it appears that the Qur’an, Shariah, and the Islamic terrorist attacks of the last thirty years, indicate that Islam is indeed a totalitarian ideology engaged in an effort of world-wide conquest much like Nazism. The major difference being that Nazism was based on racial affiliation while Islam is based on religious affiliation.

The word “Islam” – contrary to popular belief – means “submission” and not “peace.” When Islam was founded by Muhammad ibn Abdallah in the 7th century, it conquered the Arabian Peninsula through bloody wars and conquests against fellow Arabs, and Jewish tribes. After the consolidation of Islam in Arabia, the Arabs quickly moved out to conquer the Persian and Byzantine empires, as well as parts of India, and subsequently Spain.  All was done under the sword or through discrimination. It was not done by peacefully proselytizing the indigenous populations.

A Brief Overview of Shariah

The holy book of Islam – the Qur’an – contains laws and commandments for the believing Muslim. It is also a book that is replete with references to war, conquest, and the treatment of non-Muslims.  From the Qur’an (primarily), and the Sunnah and Hadith (secondarily) came – amongst other principles – the exegesis (tafsir) and jurisprudence (fiqh) of how the laws, sayings, customs, and traditions of Muhammad were to be interpreted. Thus was born Shariah (meaning the “path”). Shariah is not a simple concept to explain (even by and for Muslims), but it can simply be equated with “Islamic law.”

Shariah dictates every aspect of a Muslim’s life – both private and public. It is a total system that not only encompasses the individual, but how the government should rule as well. Islam is therefore a religio-political entity and ideally guided by a caliph (“successor”) to Muhammad. However, the Caliph came to be something of a “supreme leader” as both the head of government and the head of religion. In short, there is no separation of “mosque and state” in an ideal Islamic setting.

While different schools of Shariah exist with various interpretations of the Qur’an, Sunnah, and Hadith, all see Islam and Muslims as superior to every other religion, and view non-Muslims as “dhimmi” (plural, “dhimma”) who are regarded as inferior to Muslims under Islamic law. It is the dhimma (namely Jews, Christians, and other monotheistic religions) who must pay the jizya and kharaj (poll and land taxes) because they do not recognize the Qur’an. They must also wear distinctive clothing (usually yellow for Jews, and blue for Christians.)

The Nazi-Islamic Alliance

Read More→

SUBSCRIBE TO THIS BLOGS POSTINGS

“PROXIMITY”, as Shakespeare might have said although he didn’t, breeds hostility… That explains why Muslims have been so hostile to other religions? The other side of the coin is, always, that hostility creates an urge for proximity!

Muslims are such a demanding race that, whenever there is criticism of their brutal history around the world over, they come out in their thousands, chanting “Allahu Akbar” and engaging in acts of mindless vandalism and terror. They even openly speak out about spilling blood of innocents, play havoc, and destruction…

Why the Muslims do all this?

(‘cause we pamper ’em!!!)

Why do they have a free hand into every whim of theirs..? (Are we cowards? Are we afraid of them? Are we just gonna sit there with gloomy faces and don’t do anything about???)

(‘cause we support ‘em!!!)

Here are just some statistics on recent Muslim achievements and they “expect not criticism”:

Read More→

SUBSCRIBE TO THIS BLOGS POSTINGS

Vatican City, 22 Oct. (AKI) – The Koran is a text that encourages Islam to impose itself with force and permits the killing of Christians, said Lebanon’s Catholic Patriarch of Antioch Archbishop Raboula Beylouni, addressing a Vatican meeting of Middle East bishops.

“The Koran gives Muslims the right to judge Christians and kill them with Jihad,” he said. “It gives orders to impose religion with force, with the sword. For this reason, Muslims don’t recognise the freedom of religion among themselves or others.”

Pope Benedict XVI on 11 Oct. the opened the two-week-long meeting of 246 Middle East bishops and other religious leaders by lashing out against violence “in God’s name”.

The pontiff warned delegates to guard against the spread of “terrorist ideology” in the modern world.

Among clerics attending the meeting were Muhammad al-Sammak, political counsellor to the Grand Mufti of Lebanon, representing Sunni Islam; and Ayatollah Seyed Mostafa Mohaghegh Ahmadabadi, a law professor at the Shahid Beheshti University of Tehran and member of the Iranian Academy of Sciences, representing Shia Islam.

This great piece was left in the comments section of this post (http://thereligionofconquest.com/2011/04/19/my-letter-to-pastor-terry-jones). It is so good it almost made me cry. PLEASE PASS THIS ON!!!

Thank you Mr. Don Laird

==================================================

SUPPORT PASTOR TERRY JONES AT DEARBORN, MICHIGAN !!!!

CALL YOUR POLITICIANS AND LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCIES AND DEMAND THEY PROTECT AND SUPPORT PASTOR TERRY JONES!!!

The realities of islam are found in the fear and loathing found in our political leaders and law enforcement agencies as they quiver, tremble and shuffle away from the threats and coercion of those who follow the murderous teachings of a babbling lunatic pedophile who wandered the shifting Saharan sands spewing his vile poisonous filth into any ear that would listen…the same babbling lunatic who left nothing but misery and corpses in his wake……now 14 centuries later his black hearted, perverse, murderous disciples seek the same course of action……

We must stop this tide of insanity in its tracks.

The hour is late, the cancer of islam has eaten to the very heart of Europe and Britain and they sit precipitously on the edge of the abyss.

In recent weeks and days leaders from around Europe and Britain including The Netherlands, Nicholas Sarkozy of France, Angela Merkel of Germany, David Cameron of Britain, Geert Wilders, members of Australia’s parliament and many others have all condemned the policy of multiculturalism for the destruction, misery, discontent and untold damage it has reeked on their countries, cultures and people.

The prime contributors to the civil unrest, open conflict, acts of terrorism and destruction in each of these countries have been muslims. The muslims have sown seeds of conflict, division, sneering contempt, provocation and open hostility. Without exception, every country muslims have emigrated to has suffered greatly as a result of the presence of their new guests. Muslims have spit upon and bitten the hands of those who have extended hands of welcome, generosity and hospitality. This outrageous ingratitude, this open aggression can no longer be tolerated. The time has come to send our muslim guests home.

Calls are now being made around the world to immediately stop immigration from all islamic countries and to begin the repatriation of all muslims and muslim immigrants who have committed crimes or who espouse radical beliefs. These deportations and repatriations have been called for regardless of the place of birth, back to the Middle East and Africa. In addition to the immediate deportations are calls for laws to be passed banning the wearing of the burqa (the full bodybag covering), the hijab (headscarf) and any face covering by muslim women, this in addition to the banning of outdoor prayer sessions such as the ones seen in Paris and many other European and British cities. In addition, calls are being made to ban the building of mosques and pass laws making criminal all aspects of sharia law. In fact, the Swiss have now banned the building of muslim minarets and the French have banned hijabs/burquas and mass outdoor prayers. This must continue across Europe, Britain and North America.

There are those who will condemn the deportation and repatriation of muslims back to the Middle East and Africa as unjust and harsh. These same persons who would protest the deportation of muslims would say we should not paint all muslims with the same brush. To that assertion, I ask you to recall the last time you witnessed 10,000 “Good, Peaceful, Moderate Muslims” marching in loud and vigorous protest and condemnation of the murderous brutality of the “Bad Muslims”….it has never happened and never will happen.

(The countries that should be immediately banned are listed as the 57 member states of the Organization of Islamic Conference.)

To dismiss this as melodramatics or rhetoric is to betray your ignorance of the true state of affairs and the clearly stated, oft and loudly repeated goal of muslims and islam; The complete destruction of Western culture and the domination and subjection of all Westerners.

As said, the evidence of the cancerous effects of muslim and islamic presence can be clearly seen around the world. The letter below, an open letter to England, could well and should well, be written to every country who are now hosts to muslims.

Take a few minutes to read the open letter below. Once finished, please send it to all you know and all of those you think may be interested. Time grows short.

Thank you, Don Laird

________________________________________________________________

AN OPEN LETTER TO ENGLAND

England and Europe….harvest time is here……. reap your crop.

In Britain you are reaping the sorry crop you have sown, will you now ask us to, once again, cross oceans and spill our blood doing what you refuse to. Have you no shame?

As Britons, as men, you stand idle and indifferent as your heritage, your culture, your history and your country are destroyed. You turn away as social engineers and sneering academia fill your children’s heads with poisonous propaganda, turning them into haters of their own people and lovers, nay, worshippers of the black hearted, murderous cancer of islam. The hands of welcome and generosity you extended to muslims have been spat on and bitten. Your sacred traditions, customs and observances including your places of worship have been attacked, mocked and defiled by your muslim guests and you turn away, indifferent. Even your very monarchy suffers threat and derision and you hang your heads and look away.

Read More→

Having recently started to use Facebook, I had an experience I have to share with ya’ll. I actually met and got to do some verbal jousting with the future Prime Minister (PM) of New Zealand – Dean Campbell.

“Criticism may not be agreeable, but it is necessary. It fulfills the same function as pain in the human body. It calls attention to an unhealthy state of things.” – Winston Churchill

Let me give you this first and then I’ll do some prefacing and get on to showing the debate I had with the PM and how to refute the self refuting (it ain’t hard to do) nature of Relativism.

THE PM SAID,, “muslims terrorist physically attack but the christians do it in a mental way to make… their way to power”,, and then the PM went on to say “if a man broke into my house i would discuss why he did it and how he could change even if he had a gun to my head. just so you know i would like to become a counselor then psychologist then prime minister of new zealand“.

To the PM I have to say,, wouldn’t it just be easier if someone in your house was armed and poked a gun around the corner and shot the illegal intruder in the head and neutralized the situation? After all if your “counseling” skills fail,, wouldn’t that mean your going to get robbed and probably shot and killed yourself, and the murderer could possibly escape and go on to kill many others before he is caught and neutralized with imprisonment and justice?

“The world is a dangerous place, not because of those who do evil, but because of those who look on and do nothing.” —  Albert Einstein

“Tolerance becomes a crime when applied to Evil”. – Thomas Mann

“Tolerance meaning we tolerate all that is good and don’t tolerate idiots who wish to superimpose good with bad.”

To everyone else,, do you see what is wrong with the PM’s 2 statements? I think my friend said it best when he said,, “They are what they say we are”,, about Relativist. TO THE PM who is not astute and studious enough to know much about the fields he endeavors to enter to acquire political power,, I have to say – what you just did is called PROJECTION in psychological terms. In modern day secular terms and in Christianity, we would call that being hypocritical or not practicing what you preach. But fear not, you live in a country that still enjoys some measure of freedom and you will not be killed for your hipocracy. But if you where a Muslim in a Muslim country under the dictates of Sharia law, you would be killed for being a hypocrite and not DOING WHAT MUHAMMAD DID.

Now I have to tell you Dean (the future PM) is only 17,, so if you know me or do some investigating,, you might ask yourself AM I BEING MEAN TO DEAN FOR CALLING HIM OUT AND TRYING TO MAKE SURE HE NEVER BECOMES PM? No not at all JUST READ THE THREAD AND COMMENTS HERE and you’ll see that the PM is a passive aggressive relativistic dictator BULLY. And there is only one way to STOP A BULLY (must see – VERY FUNNY). So the fact that I have been studying and debating longer than the PM has been breathing,, is of little consequence. The little tyrant must be put down and his political aspirations must be stopped because like I ended up telling him “if you where to become Prime Minister now – all you would do is outlaw all points of view beside Moral and Cultural Relativism”.

REFUTING THE PM AND HIS CULTURAL RELATIVISM

Read More→

For the Record my name is Walid Shoebat, I used to be a radicalized Muslim willing to die for the cause of Allah until I converted to Christianity in 1994. I was involved in terror activity, a member of the PLO, was imprisoned in Jerusalem for three weeks where I was recruited to plant a bomb in Bethlehem in which thank God no one was injured. My Mother was an American and my father a Palestinian Arab. My parents sent me in 1978 to United States to study at the Loop College in Chicago Illinois. There I was recruited at a hotel “terror conference” by Jamal Said a founder of the IAP (Islamic Association of Palestine) and the Imam at one of the largest mosques in Chicago. The IAP was a forerunner to today’s Hamas terror organization and also to CAIR (Council for American Islamic relations). This was in the early 1980s when I was being trained for Jihad activities in the USA along with many other young foreign students and US citizens. The Imams are the prime recruiters for terrorism then as they are still today. The ‘terror conferences” are held all over the USA to this day, here is a link http://www.shoebat.com/videos/terrorInUSA.php to give a sample on video on one such terror conference which was held in 1989 in Kansas, over twelve years before 9/11 attacks.

Jamal Said is still the Imam today of the Bridgeview Mosque in Chicago and based on my eye witness testimony he is a terrorist, funds terrorists and is a major player in the operations of the Jihadi movements in the USA, yet he is still free at large. He would today be the Islamic equivalent of a Godfather in the Mafia. I state the above so you know Congressman King with my background and firsthand knowledge of the issue. I speak to the American people as to warn and educate of the very great dangers, which are very under played both by our media and our political leaders.

Now you have brief details of my background I would like to offer my expert opinion if you can call me an expert but may be an experienced former terrorist would be more appropriate.

Read More→

It took me about an hour to read this little booklet by the CENTER FOR THE STUDY OF POLITICAL ISLAM’s Bill Warner,, IT WAS WELL WORTH IT!

(PDF) A pdf download of Bill Warner’s short book on Sharia law (highly recommended).

The author of this article says this about himself.

“Individualist, transhumanist, American patriot, atheist, liberal, optimist, pragmatist, and regular guy — it has been my great good fortune to live my whole life free of “spiritual” concepts of any kind. I believe that evidence and reason are the keys to understanding reality; that it is technology rather than ideology or politics that has been the great liberator of humanity; and that in the long run human intelligence is the most powerful force in the universe.”

While I have to disagree with the writers naive, idealistic and romantic optimism about “human intelligence”,, I agree that REASON is a force that cannot be reckoned with,, if most humans where just “reasonable” (made use of logic and reason). I AGREE 100% that we must teach people how to reason and use logic again. It is essential!!!!!!!

=================================================================

The darkness can lift

Why I Am Not a Muslim, by Ibn Warraq (1995)

This book’s title, of course, is a nod to Bertrand Russell’s Why I Am Not a Christian. Ibn Warraq, born to a Muslim family in India and raised in Pakistan, was certainly taught Islam, as many millions of others are. At 14, however, he was sent to Britain to further his education. There he eventually learned the kinds of critical analysis that Western scholars have been applying to Judeo-Christian texts and beliefs for generations; with these tools, he came to see Islam for what it is.

So, what is it? The answer to that has always been obvious to anyone who studies it without preconceptions: it is a fabrication, and a very dangerous one. It was Ayatollah Khomeini’s fatwa against Salman Rushdie that inspired Ibn Warraq to write, but of course we’ve seen many further examples of Islam’s propensity to react with violence to even the most innocuous challenges. And unlike with Christianity and some other religions, it is impossible to dismiss such behavior as contrary to the letter or spirit of Islam. Both the Koran and Muhammad’s own words and actions (as recorded in the hadîth and his accepted biographies) endorse and even command war and violence against unbelievers and against those who disrespect the prophet and his religion. One can find Koranic verses counseling tolerance, but these are mostly in the earlier chapters, and are abrogated by more aggressive later pronouncements (this is how Islam deals with the inevitable contradictions which crop up in a sacred text of any length — when two statements in the Koran conflict, the earlier one is “abrogated”, or canceled, by the later one).

Across several chapters Ibn Warraq lays out the case for Islam’s fabricated origins. The majority of the Koran is plagiarized, with many crudely-obvious errors, from older sources — mostly from the Old Testament, but also from other ancient Jewish texts, Zoroastrianism, the New Testament, and pagan Arab folklore. It contains many grammatical errors, unlikely in a perfect rendition of God’s word. Many of the “revelations” received by Muhammad conveniently specified that he was permitted to do things that he happened to want to do at the time. According to Islamic dogma, the Koran is “uncreated” — it existed, along with God, for all of eternity before the beginning of the world — yet much of it is an as-it-happened narrative of events in Muhammad’s own time. There is even a case to be made that “Islam” as we know it actually arose after the Arab conquest of the Middle East, under the Umayyad dynasty, and that the whole accepted history of Muhammad and the first four Caliphs is as fictional as the Gospels.

Is it really possible that Islam, this frenzied colossus from which whole continents shrink in fear, this ideology for which so many fanatics are willing to kill or die, is nothing but an astonishingly shoddy scam? Ibn Warraq’s book, and the numerous scholarly sources it cites, seem to allow no other conclusion.

Aside from the fact that Islam explicitly endorses violence, the sheer flagrant shabbiness of the con may help explain the frenzy with which its adherents defend it. When growing knowledge reveals that a cherished belief is nonsense, there are two clear options: abandon the belief, or stick one’s fingers in one’s ears and yell loudly to drown out the voice of reason in one’s own head — because one knows all too well what it will say. The latter response can of course include violence against others whose words or example demonstrate that the belief is wrong and pernicious.

Read More→

One manifestation of that problem was the determined effort made by the so-called “leadership” of the Muslim population in this country not only to impugn the chairman and several of his witnesses, but to suppress these hearings altogether.  For example, groups like the Council on American Islamic Relations (CAIR), the Islamic Society of North America (ISNA) and the Muslim Public Affairs Council (MPAC) lined up fifty-five House Democrats to insist that Rep. King “reconsider the scope of these hearings and instead examine all forms of violence motivated by extremist beliefs, rather than unfairly focusing on just one religious group.”

One of the reasons for this demand became clear as Pete King’s witnesses shed light on the true nature of such self-appointed Muslim “leaders”:  They do not speak for American Muslims and are either directly tied to the Muslim Brotherhood – an organization whose mission is to “destroy Western civilization from within” – or sympathetic to its goal of bringing shariah to the United States.

Relatives of two young men who were recruited, indoctrinated and sent to engage in jihad provided frightening insights into the ways in which Muslim organizations, mosques, cultural centers and Islamic societies stealthily advance this objective.  One means is via dawa - the proselytization of the politico-military-legal doctrine of shariah.

Particularly chilling was the account of a Somali-American living in Minnesota by the name of Abdirizak Bihi.  His nephew, Burhan Hassan, was among those who joined and was killed fighting on behalf of the Islamist terrorist group al Shabab in Somalia.  He relayed how his family was warned by community “leaders” not to go to the authorities for help lest they wind up in Guantanamo Bay or facing “eternal fire and hell.”

Read More→

Don’t Offend Us, Or Else . . .

There have been cultures in the past which have institutionalised dissembling, deception and lies. The West, built upon the foundations of the Christian faith and the Ten Commandments, of which only vestiges now remain, still struggles to come to terms with institutional lying or ideologically driven deception. Almost everyone assumes that in the public square people endeavour to speak the truth.

In some Asian cultures, lying or camouflaging the truth, is very common. Stories abound of Japanese and Chinese (often regarded as inscrutable to Westerners) who manifest excessive politeness, yet inwardly despise the barbarian. The truth tends to come out at 3 am in the bars when the sake has freely flowed. The Japanese, of course, are culturally attuned to the practice of layers of deception (or deflection of the truth); they can “read through” the the dissembling. They understand what is going on.

The Cold War was largely a war fought by the respective intelligence agencies. A polite term was invented for the lies that were deliberately told to lead one’s “cold enemy” astray. That term was “disinformation”. Using lies as a weapon against the enemy has a long and noble history. It was celebrated and lionized, of course, by that ancient Chinese military strategist Sun Tzu. But the West largely accepts that in warfare such lying is fair play and within the rules of cricket.

But what happens when the West is faced with a foe or a people which is ideologically committed to lying or deceiving the West whilst there is no war in sight? The result is that the West as a whole becomes an easy dupe–or, as Lenin put it, a useful idiot. Islam is the foe. Or, more accurately, Islam sees the West as one of its foes which must be conquered and subdued as the religion of Muhammed spreads over the globe. Its religious teaching and ideology endorses telling untruths and lies to non-Muslims. To the committed Muslim the infidel is not owed the truth. If the infidel is blocking the expansion and influence of Islam he deserves to be misled and deceived in order to be defeated.

Read More→

I am writing this as I am watching The Congressional Hearings on the Radicalization of Islam for the third time. And I have to say that it is you liberals that have given me the final remedy for my sickness of being a 911 Truther/Patriot and conspiracy buff.

But ironically now that I am cured, I have a new sickness to battle and it is the leftist/liberal ideology and world-view. Michael Savage is right! I used to think it was just over-inflated and hyperbolic rhetoric to call “Liberalism a Mental Disorder” but now I believe it is true. And it is truly “Your disease that is killing me”.

Can we believe that the left is just blind, even willfully? I think not! It appears they know what they are doing and holding true to the definition of liberalism, they are striving hard to get rid of the old and to bring about a new world order of things. It’s not just the power elite of the world we must fight but the ideology they peddle and push.

As proof that I was once a big time conspiracy buff that had an aversion to all things political, just listen to my song here called “Your Blind Eyes are Killing me”. I swore I would never vote again but I will cast my vote against any democratic candidate because he might talk a good talk but in the end will be blowing the leftist ideology up my butt while my peeing on my leg telling me it is raining. Having voted independent twice, and not voting for the past 3 presidential elections, I will cast my vote next time for any Republican candidate that arises.

I used to think all politicians where corrupt puppets that where placed on the ballots by the power elite and that no matter how you voted we was going to slowly slide into a one world government and that the struggle between the left and the right was just a rouse to distract and deceive the voting Public. BUT today the Republicans made me proud to be American and the Democrats made me ashamed that I was once a little like you.

Here is a recap of the hearings.

SEE ALL 36 VIDEOS OF THE HEARING HERE.

Anyone following the issue knows that Peter King has been catching hell for holding these hearings, even to the points of threats and tightened security. And true to some peoples expectations, although I was caught off guard and unprepared for the lefts response, Many Democrats recited many of CAIRS talking points.

I’ll close with this for all you democrats and liberals,, it’s not your Blind Eyes that are killing me,, it is your disease! And I’ll spend the rest of my life, for my posterities sake, fighting the disease that you guys spread and are infected with.

A RELATED ARTICLE OF MINE.

Feeling the Bite and Sting of Multicultural Relativism and Islam by Damon Whitsell

THIS IS A MASSIVE RESOURCE YOU MUST HAVE provided by TRENCHERBONE

Abrogation – later violent scriptures replace and cancel earlier innocuous ones (see also ABr, AB1, AB2, AB3, AB4 )

Apostasy
- they’ll kill you if you try to leave their peaceful spiritual path APO1 , APO2, APO3, APO4, APO6, APO7, CEJ37, APO8, APO9, AP10, AP11, AP12, DS8, AP13, AP14, AP15, AP16, AP17, AP18, DS14, RM9,DS15

Appeasement
- giving in to their demands makes them more aggressive AP1, CEJ6 , AP2, AP4, AP5, AP6, AP7, AP9, BBC31, IS23
- Churchill on appeasement AP3, AP8

BBC
- censorship, bias, omissions, distortions, smears, cowardice, dhimmitude, taqiyya, da’wa, Eurabian propaganda and lies, lies, lies…
BBCr, BBC1, BBC2, BBC3, BBC4a, BBC4b, BBC4c, BBC5, BBC6 , BBC7, BBC8, BBC9, BBC10, BBC11, BBC12, BBC13, BBC14, BBC15, BBC16, BBC17, BBC18, BBC19, BBC20, BBC21, BBC22, BBC23, BBC24, BBC25, BBC26, BBC27, BBC28, BBC29, BBC30, BBC31, BBC32, BBC33, BBC34, BBC35, BBC36, BBC37, PO38 , BBC38, BBC39, BBC40, BBC41, BBC42, BBC43
Beslan - Child rape, torture and ritual murder (see also PI1, BE1, BE2, BE3, BE4, BE5, BE6, BE7, BE8 BE9, BE10, BE11, BE12, BE13, BE14, BE15, BE16)

Blasphemy BL1, BL2, BL3, BL3b, BL4, BL5, BL6, BL6b, LJ11, BL7, BL8, BL9, KO20 , BL10, BL11

Brothel in the Sky (72 virgins when you die killing infidels) BR1, BR2, BR3, BR4, BR5, BR8, BR9
- catamites (pretty little boys) as well BR6, BR7

Buddhism and Buddhists - attacks on BU1, BU2, BU3, BU4, BU5 , BU6, BU7, HI5, BU8, BU9, BU10, BU11, BU12, KA2, BU13, BU14, BU15, BU16a, BU16b, HA7, BU17, BU18, BU19, BU20, BU21, BU22, BU23, BU24, BU25, BU26, BU27, BU28, BU29

Read More→

One of the most potent myths of our age is that the Crusades were little more than an unprovoked attack by a barbarous Europe against a quiescent and cultured Islamic world.


According to conventional ideas, the seventh and eighth centuries constitute the great age of Islamic expansion. By the eleventh century – the time of the First Crusade – we are told that the Islamic world was quiescent and settled and that, by implication, the Crusaders were the aggressors. Indeed, the

are routinely portrayed as a horde of barbarians from a backward and superstitious Europe irrupting into the cultured and urbane world of the eleventh century Near East.

This at least is the populist language often employed on television and in newspaper articles. In my recent book Holy Warriors: Islam and the Demise of Classical Civilization, I have shown however that before the advent of Islam Christians had no concept of “Holy War” at all, and that it was from the Muslims themselves that Europeans took this idea. I showed too that the Crusades, far from being an unprovoked act of aggression on the part of Christian Europe, was part of a rearguard action aimed at stemming the Muslim advance which, by the start of the eleventh century, was threatening as never before to overwhelm the whole of Europe.

Notwithstanding the evidence presented in Holy Warriors, the consensus among the majority of medieval historians is that the threat from Islam had very little, if anything, to do with the Crusades; the Muslims were simply the convenient targets of a savage and brutal Europe, mired in a culture of habitual violence and rapine. The “energies” of Europe’s warrior-class, it is held, were simply directed by the Papacy away from internal destruction onto the convenient targets of the Islamic world. This, for example, is the line taken by Marcus Bull in his examination of the origins of the Crusades in The Oxford History of the Crusades. In an article of almost ten thousand words, Bull fails to consider the Muslim threat at all. Indeed he mentions it only to dismiss it:

“The perspective of a Mediterranean-wide struggle [between Islam and Christianity] was visible only to those institutions, in particular the papacy, which had the intelligence networks, grasp of geography, and sense of long historical tradition to take a broad overview of Christendom and its threatened predicament, real or supposed. This is a point which needs to be emphasized because the terminology of the crusades is often applied inaccurately to all the occasions in the decades before 1095 when Christians and Muslims found themselves coming to blows. An idea which underpins the imprecise usage is that the First Crusade was the last in, and the culmination of, a series of wars in the eleventh century which had been crusading in character, effectively ‘trial runs’ which had introduced Europeans to the essential features of the crusade. This is an untenable view.”(Marcus Bull, “Origins,” in Jonathan Riley-Smith (ed.) The Oxford History of the Crusades, p. 19)

With what justification, we might ask, does Bull dissociate the earlier Christian-Muslim conflicts of the eleventh century in Spain, Sicily, and Anatolia from the First Crusade?  The answer can hardly be described as convincing. “There is plenty of evidence,” he says, “to suggest that people regarded Pope Urban II’s crusade appeal of 1095-6 as something of a shock to the communal system: it was felt to be effective precisely because it was different from anything attempted before.” (Ibid) Of course it was different: the Pope had called a meeting of all the potentates and prelates of Europe to urge the assembly of a mighty force to march to Constantinople and eventually to retake the Holy Land. It was new because of its scale and its ambition. But to thus dismiss the connection with what went before in Spain and Sicily – and Anatolia – is ridiculous. Such a statement can only derive from a mindset which somehow has to see the Crusaders as the aggressors and to thereby detach them from the legitimate defensive wars which Christians had been fighting in Spain and throughout the Mediterranean in the decades immediately preceding 1095.

The fact is, in the twenty years before the First Crusade, Christendom had lost the whole of Anatolia, an area greater than France, and a region right on the doorstep of Europe. In 1050 the Seljuk leader Togrul Beg undertook Holy War against the Christians of Anatolia, who had thus far resisted the power of the Caliphs. We are told that 130,000 Christians died in the war, but that, upon Togrul Beg’s death in 1063 the Christians reasserted their independence and freedom. This was however to be of short duration, and no sooner had Togrul Beg’s nephew Alp Arslan been proclaimed Sultan than the war was renewed. In 1064 the old Armenian capital of Ani was destroyed; and the prince of Kars, the last independent Armenian ruler, “gladly handed over his lands to the [Byzantine] Emperor in return for estates in the Taurus mountains. Large numbers of Armenians accompanied him to his new home.” (Steven Runciman, The History of the Crusades Vol. 1 (Cambridge, 1951) p.61) Indeed, at this time, the entire Armenian nation was effectively transplanted hundreds of miles to the south and west.

Read More→